unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/the-paris-agreement This is the most biased “for and con” article I`ve ever read This is also a very illogical article. If we assume that a professional because 200 countries have agreed on something, it`s ridiculous, it`s certainly not that something is right! History has proven many times that consensus thinking is not always based on facts. This article is a small piece of propaganda that tries to advance the Paris Climate Treaty and seems to have been written for primary school students. While many countries have adopted the Paris Agreement, others are less optimistic. In 2017, U.S. President Donald Trump announced his intention to withdraw the United States from the Paris Agreement, previously concluded by U.S. President Barack Obama. While President Trump has made his intentions clear, in accordance with Article 28 of the Paris Agreement, the United States must remain in the agreement until November 4, 2020.  Thus, under the agreement, China will be able to increase these emissions by an astonishing number of years – 13. They can do whatever they want for 13 years. We don`t. India is conditional on its participation in receiving billions and billions of dollars in foreign aid from industrialized countries.
There are many other examples. But at the end of the day, the Paris agreement is very unfair, at the highest level, to the United States. The “Adaptation” section is perhaps one of the best results with the creation of a qualitative objective to examine the measures taken and the needs to improve the resilience of the poorest and weakest countries, in combination with the 5-year mitigation cycle. The agreement recognizes the close link with climate change action as an essential solution to reduce the need to adapt to climate change. Several fundamental rights are also explicitly mentioned to ensure that adaptation measures are tailored to the specifics of each country in order to respond to gender and to take into account vulnerable and indigenous communities. In a statement, the Union of Scientists said: “The US elections have yet to be proclaimed, so it is impossible to know whether the United States will accede to the United Nations Agreement in 2021.” For all these reasons, we can confirm that this agreement will bring about changes and solutions to the climate crisis for several decades to go. Nearly 200 nations signed the agreement, signaling global commitment and investments in more renewable energy. This number also reflects the importance of nature in air conditioning and the increase in conservation efforts.
There`s a market! This may seem very small to rejoice in, but it was by no means certain that all countries, and in particular the largest emitters today, would accept an agreement by the last day of negotiations. All politicians, negotiators and other stakeholders recalled the failure of the nightmarish Copenhagen conference in 2009. But the reality had changed because more and more people around the world were aware of the threat of climate change and were ready to act. Renewable and energy-efficient solutions are now seen as viable alternatives and almost every sector of our societies, from businesses to churches to local authorities, has begun to act voluntarily without regulatory pressure. Politicians, often influenced by corporate interests, could not ignore the critical mass of people and other interest groups. In addition to these crucial factors, the French presidency of COP21 has been wise to ensure an inclusive and partisan process in which all countries feel comfortable negotiating. In these diplomatic environments, the delicacy of attention is the key to finding the best possible compromise without leaving anyone behind. abcnews.go.com/Politics/time-us-president-dumped-global-climate-deal/story?id=47771005 First, a long-term temperature target (below 2oC or even 1.5C), a zero net emissions target for the second half of this century and a recommendation to achieve global emissions “the next